Cases 1 - 10 of 2,383
Berry v. Sullivan County Jail et al
as 1:2024mc00028
Plaintiff:
Jason Berry
Defendant:
Sullivan County Jail, Jeff Cassidy and Richard S. Venable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beraut v. Mazza et al
as 5:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Genesson Beraut
Defendant:
Warden Kevin Mazza, Brian Owens, Lane Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Krow
as 5:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Richard Yates
Respondent:
Ivan Krow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beraut v. Mazza et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Genesson Beraut
Defendant:
Kevin Mazza, Brian Owens, Lane Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv11534
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Peter Watson, Heidi Washington, Cargor and others
Shockley v. Sweet et al
as 4:2024cv11462
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Shockley
Defendant:
Sweet, Clemmons, Schirmer and others
Williams v. Eller
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Richard Williams
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Eller
as 3:2024cv00231
Petitioner:
Richard Williams
Defendant:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Singleton v. Nashville Police Dept. et al
as 2:2024cv02332
Plaintiff:
Timothy Singleton
Defendant:
Nashville Police Dept., City of Nashville, Tennessee State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
