Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Franklin v. Genesee, County of et al
as 2:2024cv11401
Plaintiff:
Andre E. Franklin
Defendant:
Genesee, County of, Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan, State of and others
King v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jacorey King
Defendant:
Warden Rose, Officer McCrainey, Unknown Transportation Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Starta et al
as 1:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Sebastian D. Vaughn and Arion J. Boggs
Defendant:
Frank Starta, FNU Giles, FNU Pulawski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamner v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02007
Petitioner:
Steffany Rose Hamner
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Department of Children Services and Davidson County Juvenile Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCarren et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv13129
Plaintiff:
Michael David McCarren, Maurice Stewart, Levertis Riley and others
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap, Boyer and others
Chivers v. Bishoff et al
as 1:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
James Chivers
Defendant:
Derreck Bishoff, Louis Gordon, H. Hochscheid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Deangelo et al
as 2:2023cv12509
Plaintiff:
Martell Jones
Defendant:
Jodi Deangelo, Godfrey, Nelson and others
McCarren et al v. Washington et al
as 4:2023cv12324
Plaintiff:
Michael D. McCarren, Walter L. Galloway, Maurice A Stewart and others
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap, Boyer and others
Smith v. Madery et al
as 2:2023cv12703
Plaintiff:
Larry David Smith
Defendant:
Brian Madery, D. Brassfield, Jennifer Norder and others
Tatum v. Rose et al
as 1:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Dustin Seth Tatum
Defendant:
Sharon Rose, Cynthia Casagrande, Steve Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
