Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LeBlanc #333019 v. People of the United States et al
as 1:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. LeBlanc #333019
Defendant:
People of the United States, Janet T. Neff, Robert Holmes Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Besser v. Sepanek et al
as 0:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
George Besser
Defendant:
M. Sepanek, Kenneth Gomez, Terri Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Baker #182416
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Prison Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv10230
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Prison Health Services, Incorporated and others
Cornell McCreary v. Robert Bell
as 11-1400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELL M. MCCREARY, named as "Carnell McCreary"
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, Judge; named as "Robert Holms Bell" and "Robert H. Bell", et al
Bolden v. Holmes et al
as 2:2009cv11020
Plaintiff:
Dominick Bolden
Defendant:
Robert Holmes, Carlos Chapman and Detroit Police Department
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
McGee #149937 v. Maki et al
as 2:2008cv00204
Plaintiff:
Raymond Frank McGee #149937
Defendant:
Linda Maki, David Bergh, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McGee #149937 v. Bergh et al
as 2:2008cv00086
Plaintiff:
Raymond Frank McGee #149937
Defendant:
David Bergh, Patricia Caruso, Peter Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McGee #149937 v. Laksnin et al
as 2:2007cv00154
Plaintiff:
Raymond Frank McGee #149937
Defendant:
Unknown Laksnin, Patricia Caruso, Gerald Hofbauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
