Cases 1 - 10 of 183
Spencer v. Stoyk et al
as 2:2024cv11255
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Spencer
Defendant:
Stoyk, Duperron and John Doe
Spencer #529310 v. Ensing et al
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Spencer #529310
Defendant:
Matthew Ensing, Margaret Greiner, Brian Majerszyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Wellpath Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Brandi Lee
Defendant:
Wellpath Corporation, Correct Care Solutions, Hayes, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #483474 v. Morrison
as 1:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Spencer Williams #483474
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alford Jr v. Wall et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Alford Jr
Defendant:
John Wall, John Hellman, John Crace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Lentz v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv10198
Plaintiff:
Gary Lentz
Defendant:
MDOC, Heidi Washington, Aleksandra Wilanowski and others
Cain v. Starks et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lee Starks, John Doe, Ofc David Killop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullen v. Wall et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Fathi Mushapha Cullen and Larry D. Alford Jr
Defendant:
John Wall, John Hellman, John Crace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston v. Tanner et al
as 2:2023cv13281
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Defendant:
Jeffery Tanner, Lawrence McKinney, Sean MacLean and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
