Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Freeman v. E'lan, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv02289
Plaintiff:
Chase Freeman
Defendant:
E'lan, LLC and Harold Feener
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Freeman et al v. Kelly Services, Inc.
as 3:2014cv02044
Plaintiff:
Kimberly K. Freeman and Tracy Owens
Defendant:
Kelly Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. Shaker Heights City Schools et al
as 1:2014cv00308
Plaintiff:
Eunice Freeman
Defendant:
Shaker Heights City Schools , AVI FoodSystems, Inc. , John A. Payiavlas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Samek et al v. Marlaina Stone, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv10187
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Samek , Ashley Jermanus , Brittany Mullins and others
Defendant:
Marlaina Stone, LLC, Marlaina Stone and Blerta Malaj
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Freeman v. Certified Maintenance Service, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00314
Plaintiff:
Charles Freeman
Defendant:
Certified Maintenance Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adkins et al v. Frasure Creek Mining, LLC et al
as 6:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
David Adkins , David Adkins, Jr. , Roy Allen and others
Defendant:
Frasure Creek Mining, LLC and Trinity Coal Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Innes v. The Martin Companies, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Angela Innes
Defendant:
The Martin Companies, LLC, Charles Martin, Jr., Tony Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Arp et al v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00770
Plaintiff:
David Arp , Robert Barker , Billy Barnett and others
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Plan Administrator, Maytag Corporation Employees Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cook v. Freeman Webb Company, Realtors
as 3:2011cv00628
Plaintiff:
Lance Cook
Defendant:
Freeman Webb Company, Realtors
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Giles v. Freeman Webb
as 1:2011cv01144
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Giles
Defendant:
Freeman Webb
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
