Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Butler-Sharp v. Franklin County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2023cv03989
Plaintiff:
Tresalyn Butler-Sharp
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Weaver et al v. Decatur County Government et al
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
Clyde Weaver and Tyler Lindsay
Defendant:
Decatur County Government and Decatur County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Taulbee v. Bell County Sheriff's Department
as 6:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
James Taulbee
Defendant:
Bell County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMSON v. Licking County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2021oe03221
Defendant:
Licking County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
DIRK WILLIAMSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williamson v. Licking County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2021cv03222
Defendant:
Licking County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Dirk Williamson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WILLIAMSON v. Licking County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2021cv03221
Defendant:
Licking County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
DIRK WILLIAMSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Feather v. Mahoning County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2021cv00921
Plaintiff:
Angel Feather
Defendant:
Mahoning County Sheriff's Office and Board of Mahoning County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Tomlinson v. Trigg County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Trigg County, Kentucky doing business as Trigg County Sheriff's Office and Aaron Acree
Plaintiff:
David Ewing Tomlinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Montgomery v. Holmes County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2020cv02267
Plaintiff:
Margaret Montgomery
Defendant:
The Holmes County Sheriff's Office, Timothy W. Zimmerly and Holmes County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Noe v. Warren County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
Martin Noe
Defendant:
Warren County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
