Cases 91 - 100 of 1,093
Bryant v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
James Bryant
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tondreon Bowles v. Terrie Achles, et al
as 23-5204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONDREON M. BOWLES, aka Tondreon M. Merriweather
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT TERRIE ACHLES, Floor Supervisor, OFFICER CALVIN EWING, OFFICER BRANDON WHITE and others
James Westley v. Brandeshawn Harris, et al
as 23-3177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WESTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BRANDESHAWN HARRIS, WARDEN LASHANN EPPINGER, MICHAEL BEEBE and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
USA v. Branea Bryant
as 23-3150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANEA BRYANT
Aundria Bryant-Branch v. USA
as 23-5125
Petitioner / Appellant:
AUNDRIA BRYANT-BRANCH
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Justin Bryant
as 23-5112
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTIN BRYANT
Bryant v. Talbot Clinical Services of Ohio, LLC
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michele Bryant
Defendant:
Talbot Clinical Services of Ohio, LLC aka and/or dba Talbot Health Services and Talbot Clinical Services of Ohio, LLC doing business as Talbot Health Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Conforti v. Owen et al
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Brent Conforti
Defendant:
Jeffery C. Owen, Michael M. Calbert, Warren Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
King v. Montgomery County et al
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Frank Emanual King
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Robert Nash, f/n/u Bushnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
