Cases 91 - 100 of 318
David Clapper, et al v. Clark Development, Inc., et al
as 17-4056
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. CLAPPER, et al
Appellant:
BRENT L. ENGLISH
Defendant:
CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
Toma v. The Huntington National Bank
as 5:2017cv13179
Plaintiff:
Amar Toma
Defendant:
The Huntington National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Majestic Building Maintenance v. Huntington Bancshares Inc.
as 16-4342
Defendant / Appellee:
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED, dba Huntington National Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAJESTIC BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01255
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Mavis et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 3:2017cv00607
Plaintiff:
Tom Mavis and Carol E. Viola
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and Huntington National Bank
Cross_defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv02098
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Schwab Industries, Inc. v. Huntington National Bank, et al
as 16-3790
Defendant / Appellee:
HAHN LOESER & PARKS, HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK and ANDREW KRAUSE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCHWAB INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
Majestic Building Maintenance v. Huntington Bancshares Inc.
as 16-4342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAJESTIC BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED, dba Huntington National Bank
The Huntington National Bank v. Collect Air, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01067
Plaintiff:
The Huntington National Bank
Defendant:
Collect Air, LLC and Squaretwo Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
