Cases 111 - 120 of 687
Watkins, Jr. v. Butcher, et al
as 1:2021cv00609
Defendant:
Karen Stanforth, Trena Butcher and Dana Blankenship
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Peter Watkins
as 21-1241
Defendant / Appellant:
PETER ARTHUR WATKINS, aka Peter Arthur Curtis-Watkins
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Watkins v. Turner
as 3:2021cv00454
Petitioner:
Charles Lee Watkins
Respondent:
Warden Neil Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watkin et al v. Bethany Christian Services et al
as 1:2021cv00127
Defendant:
Bethany Christian Services, Bethany Christian Services, Inc., Bethany Christian Services USA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Benjamin Edward Watkin, Sharon Elizabeth Watkin and Benjamin Edward Watkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas-Watkins et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv00380
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
SUSAN THOMAS-WATKINS and Melvin Savoy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watkins et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06565
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danielle Watkins and Rodger Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watkins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06466
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tommy L Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. Raque et al
as 3:2020cv00793
Defendant:
Trevor Ford, Walter Sholar, Jennifer E. Porter and others
Plaintiff:
Nazir Abdullah Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elaine Blanchard, et al v. City of Memphis, TN
as 20-6263
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL GARNER, ELAINE BLANCHARD, BRADLEY WATKINS and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
ACLU OF TENNESSEE
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, TN
Watkins v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05737
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
