Cases 121 - 130 of 498
Borden v. Sexton et al
as 0:2020cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jason Dean Borden
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USA, Officer Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borden v. Sexton et al
as 6:2020cv00045
Plaintiff:
Jason Dean Borden
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USA, Officer Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. USA et al
as 7:2019cv00113
Plaintiff:
Katrina Watts
Defendant:
Gregory Kizziah, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Mid-Atlantic Regional Office et al
as 2:2020cv02053
Defendant:
Naph Care, Inc., Dr. Prince, Mrs. Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Monty Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Himmelreich v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 19-4146
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WALTER J. HIMMELREICH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Defendant / Appellant:
JANEL FITZGERALD
Johnson v. State of Kentucky et al
as 6:2019cv00258
Respondent:
Seargant Cathers, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jason Moesley and others
Petitioner:
Marlon Jermaine Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crafton v. West et al
as 6:2019cv00229
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Mrs. Lawson, Mr. Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Joel D. Crafton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
McKim v. Dyer et al
as 6:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Mr. Dyer, Mr. Gomez, Dr. Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Joe McKim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duvall v. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2019cv00100
Petitioner:
Duane Alan Duvall
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Shelton et al
as 6:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Tommy W. Shelton, Federal Bureau of Prisons and USA
Plaintiff:
Sadiel Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
