Cases 131 - 140 of 1,064
Vernon v. SoClean, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01129
Plaintiff:
Dale Vernon, Sr.
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Studio B, Inc. et al v. Fallows et al
as 5:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Studio B, Inc. and E. Louis Petit, Sr.
Defendant:
Chris Fallows, Marzouk & Parry PLLC and Joseph Charron
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Zachery Sr. v. Bracy
as 4:2022cv01008
Petitioner:
Anthony Zachery Sr.
Respondent:
Warden Charmaine Bracy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pettaway v. Bobin et al
as 3:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Pettaway, Sr.
Defendant:
Reese Bobin, Tamika Gibson, Jeremy Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Baldazo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02135
Plaintiff:
Arnulfo Baldazo, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eckstein v. Brame et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Dale Eckstein
Defendant:
Thomas L. Brame, Sr. and Shirley Williams Brame
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Mullen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02004
Plaintiff:
John Sr. Mullen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Lee et al
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Carl Lee, Michael Lee, Gregory Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lucius et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01691
Plaintiff:
Crystal Lucius and Arturo Lucius, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
