Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Minneci et al v. McDonald et al
as 2:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
Dina Minneci and Michael Minneci
Defendant:
Katherine McDonald and Shane Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owens v. Coffey
as 6:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Cletius Ray Owens
Defendant:
Jerry Coffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coffey v. SSA
as 5:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
Clifford Ray Coffey
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coffey v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2015cv00378
Plaintiff:
Diane Coffey
Defendant:
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Coffey v. SSA
as 5:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Darrell G. Coffey
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Coffey v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
as 6:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Sandra Coffey
Defendant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Sandra Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Coffey v. Consolidated Insurance Company
as 1:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
Bedford Junior Coffey
Defendant:
Consolidated Insurance Company and Matthew D. Lewis
Thirdparty_defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and Matthew D. Lewis
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Consolidated Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Matthew D. Lewis
Cross_defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lemieux v. Foley et al
as 0:2011cv00017
Petitioner:
Mark Lemieux
Defendant:
Thomas Foley, Brian Lilly, Richard Prior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
