Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Leeper v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05006
Plaintiff:
Clyde R Leeper
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company C-8 Personal Injury Litigation
as 2:2013md02433
Plaintiff:
Anita Yerby, Roberta Sue Daugherty-Hall, Kathryn J. Post and others
Interested Party:
National Geographic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Fountain v. USA
as 1:2021cv00210
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Clyde Fountain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCoy et al v. Akron Police Department et al
as 5:2021cv00051
Plaintiff:
Clyde McCoy, J C M, Leila Cruz and others
Defendant:
Edna Copeland, Chanelwood Village, Akron Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Peffly v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv05700
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Clyde Peffly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walburn et al v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 2:2020cv04621
Plaintiff:
Chaz Lawson, Vicki P. Slone, James A Walburn and others
Defendant:
Clyde Dulin, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Bechtel Jacobs Co LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Harris v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03601
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03087
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murriel v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv01662
Plaintiff:
Clyde S Murriel
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Borawski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01091
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
James Clyde Borawski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
