Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Nankervis v. Goebel et al
as 2:2017cv11175
Plaintiff:
Kelly Nankervis
Defendant:
Matt Goebel, Paul Kinal, Michael Emmi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearce v. Emmi
as 2:2016cv11499
Plaintiff:
Megan Pearce
Defendant:
Michael Emmi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Emmie Ross v. Author Solutions, et al
as 15-4202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMIE ROSS, Author
Defendant - Appellee:
AUTHOR SOLUTIONS, dba Authorhouse, BUDDY DOW and EUGENE HOPKINS
Davies v. Goebel et al
as 2:2015cv13799
Defendant:
Matt Goebel, Paul Kinal, Michael Emmi and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Andrew Davies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harden et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02438
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC , U.S. Bank National Association and Weiss Spicer Cash, PLLC
Plaintiff:
Clyde Harden and Emmie Harden
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross v. Author Solutions, et al.
as 3:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Emmie Ross
Defendant:
Author Solutions , Buddy Dow and Eugene Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joshua Clay v. Michael Emmi, et al
as 14-2351
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA CLAY
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL EMMI, Hazel Park Police Officer
Defendant:
RICHARD STORY, Hazel Park Firefighter/Medic, MICHAEL SHARROW, Hazel Park Firefighter/Medic, PAUL VANDENADELLE, Security Personnel at St. John Oakland Hospital and others
Clay v. Emmi et al
as 2:2013cv11555
Plaintiff:
Joshua Clay
Defendant:
Michael Emmi, Richard Story, Michael Sharrow and others
Marshall v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22973
Plaintiff:
Emmy Ann Marshall
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McElroy v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22439
Plaintiff:
Emmy McElroy
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
