Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hastings v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01083
Plaintiff:
Thomas Warren Hastings
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Popp v. Hastings Entertainment, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00478
Plaintiff:
Josiah E. Popp
Defendant:
Hastings Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sony/ATV Music Publishing, LLC et al v. 172902 Ontario, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01929
Defendant:
PRIDDIS MUSIC INC., DIGITOP LTD, CARYN MIMOUN and others
Plaintiff:
EMI BRILLIG MUSIC INC., EMI HASTINGS CATALOG INC., EMI Robbins Catalog Inc. and others
Counter Plaintiff:
1729172 Ontario, Inc. and Gai Marcos
Interested Party:
Ramona DeSalvo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Massey v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2014cv00219
Petitioner:
Allen Massey
Respondent:
Suzanne R Hastings and Robert E. Cooper, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hastings Entertainment, Inc. v. NPK Cordova, LLC
as 2:2012cv03063
Plaintiff:
Hastings Entertainment, Inc.
Defendant:
NPK Cordova, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Serafini v. Page et al
as 1:2011cv01405
Plaintiff:
Travis Michael Serafini
Defendant:
Steve Page, Henry County, B. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Escobar et al v. Gaines et al
as 3:2011cv00994
Plaintiff:
Angel Enrique Nunez Escobar, Jesus Antonio Sanchez Villalobos, Jorge Palencia Sarmiento and others
Defendant:
Lee Gaines, Christopher Koshar, Lee C. Worsham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benefiel et al v. Page et al
as 1:2011cv01307
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C Benefiel and Travis Michael Serafini
Defendant:
Steve Page, Henry County Jail, B. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
