Cases 11 - 20 of 336
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Taylor et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Reagan Taylor, Jailer Steve Tussey, Unknown Deputy Jailers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Hensley et al
as 0:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Evan M. White
Defendant:
Jailer William D. Hensley, Nurse Trish Unknown and Boyd County Fiscal Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Marshall et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Captin Thomas Marshall, Jailer Ken Claud, Comprehensive Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.T.B. v. Byers et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
M.T.B.
Respondent:
Shawn Byers and Jailer Jason Maydak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cerimovic v. Byers et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Zinaid Najo Cerimovic
Respondent:
Shawn Byers and Jailer Jason Maydak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garner v. Claud et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ryan Garner
Defendant:
Jailer Ken Claud, Lt. Donald Underwood and Nurse Leesia Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Elliott
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Tucker Lewis
Defendant:
Jailer Kelli Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cain v. Cross et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Ofc Cross, Calloway County, WKCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Bunnell
as 5:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Aaron Evans
Respondent:
Judge Kimberly Bunnell and Jailer Steven Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
