Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Boles v. Ford
as 3:2015cv01144
Petitioner: Kenneth Lee Boles
Respondent: Tommy Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Kenneth Lang-Knight
as 15-2083
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: KENNETH LEE LANG-KNIGHT
Swartz v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01832
Plaintiff: Kenneth Lee Swartz
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenneth Daniels v. Carmen Palmer
as 13-1744
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNETH LEE DANIELS
Respondent - Appellee: CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden
Page et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20470
Plaintiff: Kenneth Lee Page and Carolyn R. Page
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Southern Forest Watch, Inc. et al v. Salazar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00116
Plaintiff: Southern Forest Watch, Inc. , John Walton Quillen , Earl Rob Cameron and others
Defendant: Kenneth Lee Salazar, Jonathan B. Jarvis, Dale A. Ditmanson and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Anderson v. Schofield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01066
Plaintiff: Kenneth Lee Anderson
Defendant: Derrick Schofield, Henry Steward, Brenda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kenneth Lang-Knight
as 12-2577
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: KENNETH LEE LANG-KNIGHT
Case v. Rapelje We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv10845
Petitioner: Kenneth Lee Case
Respondent: Lloyd Rapelje
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Natasha Logan, et al
as 11-8064
Debtor: In re: NATASHA MARIE LOGAN and KENNETH LEE LOGAN, SR.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?