Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Daniels v. Napoleon et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2014cv10609
Plaintiff:
Reginald Daniels
Defendant:
Benny Napoleon, McMillan, Kozlowski and others
Lau v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20174
Plaintiff:
John Lau
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carmichael v. Correctional Medical Services et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2012cv13594
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Nick Ludwick, Scott L Holmes and others
USA v. Hing Lau
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-3557
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HING SHING LAU
Lau v. Aldi, Inc. (Kansas)
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv00621
Plaintiff:
Bradley A. Lau
Defendant:
Aldi, Inc. (Kansas)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ray v. Caruso et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2008cv15208
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Correctional Medical Services, George Pramstaller and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.