Cases 11 - 20 of 134
Roy Stucker, et al v. Louisville Metro Government, et al
as 23-5214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY STUCKER and COURTNEY BROWN-PORTER, on behalf of herself and as guardian and next friend of her minor child, S.W.
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, UNKNOWN METRO POLICE OFFICERS and WESLEY TROUTMAN
Kathy Miller v. House of Boom Kentucky LLC
as 23-5042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHY MILLER, as next friend of her minor child E.M.
Defendant / Appellee:
HOUSE OF BOOM KENTUCKY, LLC
Nelson v. Sharp
as 3:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Robbin Nelson
Defendant:
Heather Sharp
Interested Party:
Robert A. Sharp, Jr., Jerry Wells, Minor Child 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Other Fraud
Malick et al v. Croswell-Lexington District Schools et al
as 2:2022cv11126
Plaintiff:
April Malick, Individually and as Next Friend for C.M., a minor child, Rob Malick, Individually and as Next Friend for C.M., a minor child, April Malick and others
Defendant:
Croswell-Lexington District Schools, Croswell-Lexington Board of Education, Dan Gilbertson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
George Cunningham v. Maria Quinn, et al
as 22-1279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE CUNNINGHAM, on behalf of minor child
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA QUINN and PAUL QUINN
Resurrection School, et al v. Robert Gordon, et al
as 22-1219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RESURRECTION SCHOOL and CHRISTOPHER MIANECKI, individually and as next friend on behalf of his minor children C.M., Z.M., and N.M.
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE SMITH, individually and as next friend on behalf of her minor child F.S.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT GORDON, in his official capacity as the Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan, LINDA VAIL, in her official capacity as the Health Officer of Ingham County and others
Michael Derrick, et al v. Rickie Friar, et al
as 21-6167
Plaintiff:
GINNY HUMPHREY, as parent and legal guardian of minor child, O.H.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GREGORY DERRICK, Guardian ad Litem of minor child, OH
Defendant:
RICKIE FRIAR, Individually and in official capacity, RAY DOUGLAS, individually and in his official capacity, RICHARD HODGES, individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RITA STANBACK, individually and in her official capacity and FRANK TENNANT, individually and in his official capacity
Angel Gipson, et al v. Rickie Friar, et al
as 21-6169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGEL GIPSON, as parent and legal guardian of minor child, B.W.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GREGORY DERRICK, as Guardian ad Litem of minor child OH
Defendant:
RICKIE FRIAR, individually and in official capacity, RAY DOUGLAS, individually and in his official capacity, RICHARD HODGES, individually and in official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RITA STANBACK, individually and in official capacity and FRANK TENNANT, individually and in official capacity
George Cunningham v. Maria Quinn, et al
as 21-1716
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE CUNNINGHAM, on behalf of minor child
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA QUINN and PAUL QUINN
Resurrection School, et al v. Elizabeth Hertel, et al
as 21-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RESURRECTION SCHOOL and CHRISTOPHER MIANECKI, individually and as next friend on behalf of his minor children C.M., Z.M., and N.M.
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE SMITH, individually and as next friend on behalf of her minor child F.S.
Defendant:
ELIZABETH HERTEL, in her official capacity as the Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Defendant / Appellee:
LINDA VAIL, in her official capacity as the Health Officer of Ingham County and CAROL A. SIEMON, in her official capacity as the Ingham County Prosecuting Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
