Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 643
Hill et al v. United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00121
Plaintiff: Jimmy H. Hill and Kenny Hartman
Defendant: United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC, MERS Nominee, Freddie Mac and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021mc50732
Plaintiff: Kimberly White and Jesse White
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Ensley et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00297
Defendant: GMAC Mortgage Corporation, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Marion D. Ensley and Thomas A. Ensley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Voss v. Quicken Loans LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00756
Plaintiff: Samuel Voss
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. and Quicken Loans LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landers v. Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC et al (JRG1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00183
Defendant: Loancare, LLC, Joseph B. Pitt, Jr., Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Ronald T. Landers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America et al v. Tree-Removal Rights And Additional Easement Rights With Respect To Preexisting Easement And Right-of-Way Over Land In Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00450
Plaintiff: Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Defendant: Kerry Webb, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Tree-Removal Rights And Additional Easement Rights With Respect To Preexisting Easement And Right-of-Way Over Land In Davidson County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. Tree-Removal Rights And Additional Easement Rights With Respect To Preexisting Easement And Right-of-Way Over Land In Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00437
Defendant: Christopher C. Pirtle, Christopher Charles Pirtle, Geoff Post and others
Plaintiff: Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Davidson County, Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00365
Defendant: Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Davidson County, Tennessee, Roushi Pazouki, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00364
Defendant: Hugh M. Queener, Tree-Removal Rights with Respect to Land in Davidson County, Tennessee, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Rover Pipeline LLC v. 1.23 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVITUDE), AND 3.74 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, IN LENAWEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, Office of the Lenawee C et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv10365
Defendant: 1.23 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVITUDE), AND 3.74 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, IN LENAWEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, Office of the Lenawee C, 2.14 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, PERMANENT EASEMENT (PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVITUDE), AND 4.53 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY WORK SPACE, IN LENAWEE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, Waterland Farms, LLC Tr, Michael P. Croghan and others
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Intervenor Defendant: RSG Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?