Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Rouster v. Saginaw, County of et al
as 1:2011cv10986
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rouster
Defendant:
Saginaw, County of, Alvin Rimmer, Michael VanHorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rouster v. Saginaw, County of et al
as 2:2011cv10986
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rouster
Defendant:
Saginaw, County of, Alvin Rimmer, Michael VanHorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rimmer v. Holder et al
as 3:2010cv01106
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Rimmer
Defendant:
Eric Holder, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Wright v. Trull et al
as 3:2010cv00761
Plaintiff:
Dan Wright
Defendant:
Leigh Trull, Mike Christensen, TDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bumpas v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Bumpas
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Brian Koehn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bumpas v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2009mc00207
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Bumpas
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Brian Koehn and others
Batts et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02691
Plaintiff:
Stanley Batts, Courtney J. Cain, Joanne Clinton and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Batts et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01243
Plaintiff:
Stanley Batts, Courtney J. Cain, Joanne Clinton and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rimmer-Bey v. Foltz
as 2:1986cv40574
Plaintiff:
Rickey Rimmer-Bey
Defendant:
Dale Foltz
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
