Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Meeks #176401 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00839
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meeks #176401
Defendant:
Shauna Dunning, Bridget M. McCormack, S. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royster v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv03128
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Billie A. Royster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
John Doe v. University of Michigan, et al
as 20-1293
Defendant:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN and UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
Defendant / Appellant:
LAURA BLAKE JONES, PAMELA HEATLIE, SUZANNE MCFADDEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE
University of Michigan, et alIn re: University of Michigan, et al
as 20-1248
Petitioner:
E. ROYSTER HARPER, In re: UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, LAURA BLAKE JONES and others
Respondent:
JOHN DOE
John Doe v. David Baum, et al
as 19-2270
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN PRITZEL, BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, E. ROYSTER HARPER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Anthony Meeks v. MDOC, et al
as 19-2240
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER MONROE, ARF, JEROME W. ZIMMER, Chief Court Clerk, LARRY S. ROYSTER, Court Clerk and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY MEEKS
Meeks v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv12506
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meeks
Defendant:
Officer Monroe, Bridget M. McCormack, S. Campbell and others
Bryant Royster v. Kevin Lindsey
as 19-1304
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRYANT LAMONT ROYSTER
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN LINDSEY, Warden
Royster v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01825
Plaintiff:
Michael Royster
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Royster v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00373
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Vickie Royster
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
