Cases 11 - 20 of 2,281
Odell et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Odell, G. Doe, J. Doe and others
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jim Hivner, Sara Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New Muslim Party v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
New Muslim Party
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Angelos Washington
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, The, Tennessee Department of Correction, Bledsoe County Correction Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Obion County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv01082
Petitioner:
Carale Shields
Respondent:
Obion County, Tennessee and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Nathaniel S Robinson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Duncan v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
James D Duncan
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jeremy Sims
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enix v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Tyler Ward Enix
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
