Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Jackson v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17701
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Jackson
Defendant:
The Lincoln Electric Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, Arcos Alloys and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jackson v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. et al
as 1:2008wf17509
Plaintiff:
Thomas V Jackson
Defendant:
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Airco/The BOC Group, Inc., ESAB Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jackson v. Chandler
as 5:2008cv00223
Petitioner:
Thomas Neal Jackson
Respondent:
Larry D. Chandler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Washington v. Jackson et al
as 2:2008cv11235
Plaintiff:
Anthony Washington
Defendant:
Thomas Edwards Jackson, Susan Meinberg, Jeffrey Woods and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Robert Winburn v. A. T. O'Sullivan, et al
as 08-1232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WINBURN, aka Scott Libby
Defendant - Appellee:
A. T. O'SULLIVAN, Clerk of the Court and THOMAS E. JACKSON, Circuit Court Judge
Robert Winburn v. Thomas Jackson, et al
as 08-1166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WINBURN, aka Scott Libby
Defendant - Appellee:
A. T. O'SULLIVAN, Clerk of the Court and THOMAS E. JACKSON, Circuit Court Judge
Robert Winburn
as 08-1039
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT WINBURN, aka Scott Libby
Respondent:
THOMAS E. JACKSON, Circuit Court Judge and A. T. O'SULLIVAN, Clerk of the Court
Winburn v. Jackson, et al
as 5:2007cv15440
Plaintiff:
Robert Winburn
Defendant:
Thomas E Jackson and A T O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Washington v. Jackson et al
as 2:2007cv15312
Plaintiff:
Anthony Washington
Defendant:
Thomas Edward Jackson, Earl Washington, Susan Meinberg and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Rhoden #205474 v. Jackson et al
as 1:2007cv00840
Petitioner:
Richard R. Rhoden #205474
Respondent:
Thomas E. Jackson, Kym Worthy and Vera Massey Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
