Cases 21 - 30 of 452
Samson v. Mays (JRG3)
as 4:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Samson
Defendant:
Amy Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Lee et al v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02170
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee, Lakendria Madson and Karlos Thomas
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Floyd Bonner, W. Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Moore et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Robert Moore and Amy Moore
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech U.S., Inc., TPG, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hall v. Ballad Health
as 2:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Corey Hall, Anna M Ayers, Chloe Burleson and others
Counter Claimant:
Ballad Health
Defendant:
Janice L Nelson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Clayton v. Hogan et al
as 3:2022cv00936
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Lauren Hogan, Glenn Funk, Amy Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Trapp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Amy Trapp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moses v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02720
Plaintiff:
Pamela Moses
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Steve Mulroy and Amy Weirich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
