Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Hoop v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Hoop
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Merrick et al v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv13630
Plaintiff:
Willie Amos Merrick and Wilma C Merrick
Defendant:
Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., Devilbiss Air Power Company, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lang v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv13102
Plaintiff:
Gordon Lang
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Emhart Teknologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slye v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
Fred Slye
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. , Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc. and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mac Tools, a division of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. v. Diaz III et al
as 2:2011cv00940
Plaintiff:
Mac Tools, a division of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Defendant:
Andres Diaz III and Elba Maria Ceballo
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Swartz et al v. Delta International Machinery Corp. et al
as 2:2011cv00416
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Swartz and Stephen Buehrer
Defendant:
Delta International Machinery Corp. , Pentair, Inc. , The Black & Decker Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Stephen Buehrer
Cross_defendant:
Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. , Delta International Machinery Corp. , Pentair, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-4042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
