Cases 21 - 30 of 153
Aaron Chavez v. David Leu
as 23-1002
Petitioner / Appellant:
AARON CHAVEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID LEU, substituted for Michael Breckon
Chavez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04185
Plaintiff:
Bobby Chavez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Juan Lopez Chavez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3964
Petitioner:
JUAN GABRIEL LOPEZ CHAVEZ and ARISELDA CRISTAL LOPEZ CHAVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Smith #267009 et al v. Brock et al
as 1:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Derrick Smith, Chauvez Chavez, J.B. and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Inc, Microsoft LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Juan Lopez Chavez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3562
Petitioner:
JUAN GABRIEL LOPEZ CHAVEZ and ARISELDA CRISTAL LOPEZ CHAVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Chavez #65935-112 v. Breckon
as 1:2022cv00561
Petitioner:
Aaron Chavez #65935-112
Respondent:
Michael Breckon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
USA v. Steven Phillips-Hall
as 22-1492
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN CHAVEZ PHILLIPS-HALL
Chavez v. Breckon et al
as 1:2022cv00452
Petitioner:
Aaron Chavez
Respondent:
M. Breckon, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Chavez et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01967
Plaintiff:
Raymond Chavez and Marie Chavez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
