Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Harlow v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00933
Plaintiff:
Tammy Anderson Harlow
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Misti Harlow v. Western Ohio Regional Treatment and Habilitation Center, et al.
as 3:2014cv00879
Plaintiff:
Misti Harlow
Defendant:
Western Ohio Regional Treatment and Habilitation Center , Facilities Governing Board and Mark Fuerstenau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Harlow et al
as 3:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Billy J. Harlow, Vicky D. Harlow, J.B. Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Howard Back
as 13-6483
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HOWARD HARLOW BACK
Harlow v SSA
as 5:2013cv00255
Plaintiff:
Michael Jon Harlow
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Harlow v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2010cv00242
Plaintiff:
Teresa H. Harlow
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
United States of America v. Harlow et al
as 0:2010cv00042
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tiney Harlow and Unknown Spouse of Tiney Harlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Harlow v. Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - County of Oakland et al
as 2:2010cv11493
Plaintiff:
Carl William Harlow
Defendant:
Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - County of Oakland, Oakland University, Oakland University - Technology Services and others
Amos v. McCathren et al
as 1:2007cv01030
Plaintiff:
Christopher Amos and Christopher Amos
Defendant:
Garold McCathren, James Seth, Miranda Seth and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harlow v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 7:2008cv00199
Plaintiff:
Clyde William Harlow, Clyde William Harlow, Clyde William Harlow and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
