Cases 21 - 30 of 84
NUNEZ et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2020cv10010
Plaintiff:
David Lyndon Johns, Robert W. Kirby, Gustavo Nicolas Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nunez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03751
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Droesser et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019cv12365
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Fowlkes, Matthew Parker, Trevor Wentz and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Special Master:
Christopher G. Darrow
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Abner Nunez, Robert D Peters, James Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Edwin Castro v. William Barr
as 19-3654
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
EDWIN DOLORES NUNEZ CASTRO
Victor Nunez v. Sean Bowerman
as 19-3582
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN COLEMAN, Warden and SEAN BOWERMAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
VICTOR NUNEZ
Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01243
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Salomon Sanchez Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Nunez-Reynoso v. Merlak
as 4:2018cv02080
Respondent:
Warden Steven Merlak
Petitioner:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nunez et al v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00848
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc and Bard Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jesus Nunez and Virginia Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nunez v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00870
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julio Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2018md02846
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pauline R Currey, Gerald Lane, Abraham Furleiter and others
Interested Party:
David Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
