Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01258
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ndiaye v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2015cv02655
Petitioner:
Same Ndiaye
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, Sheriff of Geauga County Jail, Chardon, Ohio, Secretary for the Department of Homeland Security (ICE) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02083
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Eliseo Ovalle-Ruiz v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 14-3130
Petitioner:
ELISEO OVALLE-RUIZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General and JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv12957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pedro Sanjuan-Ramirez v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-3323
Petitioner:
PEDRO SANJUAN-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General and JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv14792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv12911
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Center for Bio-Ethical Reform,, et al v. Janet Napolitano, et al
as 10-1439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIO-ETHICAL REFORM, INC., GREGG CUNNINGHAM and KEVIN MURRY
Defendant - Appellee:
JANET NAPOLITANO, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
