Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-6498
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tripp v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20883
Plaintiff:
Tomi E. Tripp
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stokes v. Tripp et al
as 3:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
Brett D Stokes, Esq.
Defendant:
Irene Evans Tripp , Joseph A Tripp and James B Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Spivak v. Law Firm of Tripp Scott, P.A. et al
as 1:2013cv01342
Plaintiff:
Paul Spivak
Defendant:
Law Firm of Tripp Scott, P.A. , John M. Mullin , Megan L. Janes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Tripp Dargie, et al v. USA
as 13-5608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRIPP DARGIE and HOLLEY DARGIE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Whitehorn, Tankersley, and Davis, PLLC et al v. Tripp
as 2:2012mc00044
Movant:
Whitehorn, Tankersley, and Davis, PLLC
Defendant:
Karen Tripp
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Dargie et al v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv02169
Plaintiff:
Tripp Dargie and Holley Dargie
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Tripp v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22180
Plaintiff:
Carl Tripp
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
