Cases 21 - 30 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brinegar v. London, Kentucky et al
as 6:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Cody M. Brinegar
Defendant:
London, Kentucky, Laurel County, Kentucky, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnett v. Thomas
as 4:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Bobby Eugene Arnett
Defendant:
Sundie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Laurel County Correctional Center et al
as 6:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Collins
Defendant:
Laurel County Correctional Center, Austin Abner, Travis Cathers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams-Rosales v. Riverdale Claims Management, LLC et al
as 7:2021cv00094
Plaintiff:
Robyn Adams-Rosales and Robyn Bentley
Defendant:
Riverdale Claims Management, LLC, Proassurance Specialty Insurance Company, Inc., ProAssurance Corporation doing business as Proassurance Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arnett v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 4:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Bobby Eugene Arnett
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Seawright et al v. Arnett
as 2:2021cv02604
Plaintiff:
Rickey Seawright and Lisa Seawright
Defendant:
Meleka Arnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnett v. Lewis et al
as 4:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Bobby Eugene Arnett
Defendant:
Jailer Mike Lewis and Hopkins County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Arnette et al
as 2:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerrmar Lewis
Defendant:
Sarah Arnette, Robert Sanders, Kathleen Lape and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
