Cases 31 - 40 of 651
Barnett v. USA
as 5:2022cv00232
Petitioner:
Robert H. Barnett
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bell v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Marti E. Bell
Defendant:
H. Joyner, Melvin, Herley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Kent Hendrickson, Glenn E. Acree, Christopher Nickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick v. Harrison et al
as 3:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Raigan Kendrick
Defendant:
Charles H. Harrison, Jr., Safeway Logistics, Inc, Myron Blissett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Henderson v. Sutherland et al
as 3:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Defendant:
Ashley Sutherland, Clerk Kate Morgan, Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pulliam v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Glennys Pulliam
Defendant:
Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. doing business as R+L Carriers, Inc and Shiloh H. Everhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Smith v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith
Respondent:
H. Joyner, D. Altizer, Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Proctor v. Gilley et al
as 5:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Proctor
Defendant:
T. Gilley, H. Ray, T. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Werman v. Joyner et al
as 2:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Alfred Werman
Defendant:
Warden H. Joyner, Psycology Dr. Lefever, Mr. Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Werman v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Alfred Werman
Defendant:
H. Joyner, Dr. Lefever, Mr. Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
