Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Staffney #862514 v. Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
as 1:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
Marquan D. Staffney #862514
Defendant:
Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staffney v. Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
as 2:2017cv10690
Plaintiff:
Marquan D. Staffney
Defendant:
Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
Cary Cosgrove v. Tony Trierweiler, et al
as 16-2538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARY COSGROVE
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY TRIERWEILER, Warden, Warden, named as Tony Trieweiler, [UNKNOWN] DAVIDS, ADW, LAUREN NORMINGTON, unit counselor and others
Defendant:
[UNKNOWN] ROBINSON, Grievance Department, MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility and [UNKNOWN] HAMMOND, unit corrections officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv13507
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Rickie Bellamy, Jr.
as 16-1752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICKIE BELLAMY, JR.
Syzak v. Prison Health Care Services et al
as 2:2015cv14263
Plaintiff:
Scott Syzak
Defendant:
Prison Health Care Services, Kevin Cornings and Bellamy Creek Warden
Ramsey v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2015cv02405
Defendant:
City of Cleveland , Spencer Bellamy, Lacora Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Renisha Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey LeBlanc v. Bellamy Creek Corr. Facility
as 15-1978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY R. LEBLANC
Defendant - Appellee:
BELLAMY CREEK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Jeffrey LeBlanc v. Bellamy Creek Corr. Facility
as 15-1978
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY R. LEBLANC
Defendant / Appellee:
BELLAMY CREEK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
LeBlanc #333019 v. Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
as 1:2015cv00576
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. LeBlanc #333019
Defendant:
Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
