Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Benjamin Lopez v. R. Keller, et al
as 20-5326
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAPLAIN HIGHLEY, CAPTAIN NORRIS, R. KELLER, Case Counselor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN P. LOPEZ
Daniel Horacek v. Mike Martin, et al
as 19-2497
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS PRISK, Chaplain and MIKE MARTIN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL HORACEK
Lopez v. Keller et al
as 0:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Chaplain Highley, Captain Norris, C. O. McCormick and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin P. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstead v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2019cv04857
Defendant:
Dep Carmen, Sgt. Obrien, Nurse Jane Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Demarco Armstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cecil Koger v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 19-4020
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL DAVIS, Religious Services Administrator, TODD ISHEE, Regional Director, ALEXANDER KOSTENKO, Chaplain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CECIL KOGER
Kenneth Colvin, Jr. v. Connie Horton, et al
as 19-2067
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE RINK, Chaplain, DAVID M. LEACH, Former MDOC Special Activities Coordinator, JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, Former Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH COLVIN, JR.
Thomas Klein v. Richard Bowen, et al
as 19-3828
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS KLEIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENTANT BOWEN, Mail Room Supervisor, CHAPLAIN RADER, BRYANT PALMER, Deputy Warden and others
Kevin Tolliver v. Emma Collins, et al
as 19-3761
Defendant / Appellee:
ABDUL RAHMAN SHAHID, JOHN AND JANE DOE, Staff and Administrators, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, ROCHELLE MOORE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN A. TOLLIVER
Freddy Hardrick v. Duncan MacLaren, et al
as 19-1577
Defendant / Appellee:
DUNCAN MACLAREN and LINDA MCQUIGGAN, Chaplain
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDDY HARDRICK
Allah v. Henderson et al
as 3:2019cv00616
Defendant:
Kimberly Henderson, Chaplain McCullum and Imam Ibrahim
Plaintiff:
El-Barseem K. Allah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
