Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Cuttle
as 2:2011cv13442
Petitioner:
Janice Donahue, Raymond Biggs, Phillip Sotiroff and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of Michigan Heritage Bank
Defendant:
Timothy J. Cuttle
Intervenor:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Michigan Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-5618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Buess v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2014cv00826
Plaintiff:
David Lee Buess
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Social Security Administration, Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Comerica Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta et al
as 2:2014cv10868
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and Extruded Aluminum Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Comerica Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
as 5:2013cv14333
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rutkowski v. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
as 2:2013cv14131
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Frederick Rutkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
as 1:2012cv01059
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
