Cases 31 - 40 of 2,789
Hill v. Rausch
as 2:2024cv02228
Plaintiff:
Michelle P. Hill
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson et al. v. Willoughby Hills P.D. et al.
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson and Latoya Brisco
Defendant:
Willoughby Hills P.D., Officer Boepple, Officer Coninenza and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Garner et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01610
Plaintiff:
Mark Garner and Karen Hill
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Johnson v. Brian Barney, et al
as 24-3287
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BARNEY, JASON JOSEPH, WILLIAM COOL and others
Listerman v. Notting Hill LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10868
Plaintiff:
Anne Listerman
Defendant:
Notting Hill LLC and CVS Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grayson v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01077
Not Yet Classified:
Eunice Minter Gudger
Plaintiff:
Michael C Grayson
Defendant:
Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc., Seyfarth Shaw, Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Devin Howard v. Jamie Onion, et al
as 24-3273
Plaintiff:
DEVIN D. HOWARD
Defendant:
JAMIE ONION, RONALD PARMERTOR, MICHAEL J. GERARDI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Mark Hill v. Jennifer Pell, et al
as 24-3268
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY HILL
Defendant:
JENNIFER PELL, SCOTT CRAWFORD, BRITTANY N. HAMM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
