Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Whitener v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv01562
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Whitener
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Marina Cadreche, Kenneth Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv01423
Plaintiff:
Howard Hawk Willis
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Centurion of Tennessee, Kenneth Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Tony Parker, et al
as 17-506
Petitioner:
In re: TONY PARKER, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Corrections, MARINA CADRECHE, Assistant Commissioner of Rehabilitative Services, Tennessee Department of Corrections and KENNETH WILLIAMS, Medical Director, Tennessee Department of Corrections, in their official capacities.
Respondent:
CHARLES GRAHAM, aka Charles Stevenson and RUSSELL L. DAVIS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated.
Thomas Farr v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC, et al
as 17-5482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS W. FARR
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTURION OF TENNESSEE, LLC, CORIZON, INC., DR. CRUMP and others
Wright v. Yanders et al
as 1:2017cv01077
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wright
Defendant:
Recie Yanders, FNU Tucker, Natalie Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Centurion, Private Health Care Provider under contract with the Tennessee Department of Correction; (hereinafter "TDOC") et al
as 1:2017cv01051
Plaintiff:
Omowale Ashanti Shabazz
Defendant:
Centurion, Private Health Care Provider under contract with the Tennessee Department of Correction; (hereinafter "TDOC"), Tony Parker, Kenneth Williams, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Parker et al
as 1:2016cv01327
Plaintiff:
Willie Perry, Jr.
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Kenneth Williams, Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2016cv01954
Plaintiff:
Charles Graham and Russell L. Davis
Defendant:
Tony C. Parker, Marina Cadreche and Kenneth Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
