Cases 31 - 40 of 120
McGowan v. USA
as 5:2018cv11831
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Andriel McGowan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Progressive Northern Insurance Company et al v. City of Rocky River et al
as 1:2018cv00524
Plaintiff:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company and United Financial Casualty Company
Defendant:
City of Rocky River, Collin W. Cunningham, William J. Brobst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
McGowan v. Ditech Financial et al
as 1:2018cv00270
Plaintiff:
Elisabeth J. McGowan
Defendant:
Ditech Financial , Law Offices of Clunk, Paisley, Hoose , Charles V. Gasior and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Bunch v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
Keresa McGowan Bunch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McGowan v. Wainwright
as 1:2017cv02225
Petitioner:
Andre McGowan
Respondent:
Lyneal Wainwright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGowan & Company, Inc. et al v. Jorgensen & Company et al
as 1:2017cv01891
Plaintiff:
McGowan & Company, Inc. and Thomas B. McGowan, IV
Defendant:
Jorgensen & Company and Rickard Jorgensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGowan v. Young
as 2:2017cv11599
Plaintiff:
Anthony McGowan
Defendant:
FNU C. Young
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Connie McGirr, et al v. Thomas Rehme, et al
as 17-3519
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONNIE MCGIRR, MARY ANN BAILEY, DEBBIE CARMAN-STATON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS F. REHME and WAITE, SCHNEIDER, BAYLESS & CHESLEY COMPANY, L.P.A., an Ohio Corporation
Defendant:
STANLEY M. CHESLEY
Johnny McGowan, Jr. v. Clement Barnard, et al
as 17-5392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY L. MCGOWAN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CLEMENT BARNARD and CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES
Defendant:
O. OSBORNE, LIEUTENANT KEVIN GUNN, VICKIE BYBEE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
