Cases 31 - 40 of 145
Darrin LaPine v. Booth, et al
as 21-2852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRIN LAPINE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER BOOTH, SGT SLATER, CARMEN MCINTYRE, Correctional Medical Officer and others
Nguyen v. US Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 1:2021cv01109
Plaintiff:
Bay Dinh Nguyen
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Nguyen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv01366
Plaintiff:
Jessica Marie Nguyen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
The Estate of Linda Nguyen v. Estes Express Lines, Incorporated
as 4:2021cv11389
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Linda Nguyen
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
McKee v. TAK Communications, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02385
Plaintiff:
Caleb McKee
Defendant:
Cable Technology Communications, LLC, TAK Communications, Inc. and Thanh Nguyen
Lewis v. Nguyen et al
as 3:2021cv00347
Defendant:
Thao Nguyen and Optima Tax Relief, LLC
Plaintiff:
Parise Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Vince Nail Spa, Inc. v. M Vince Nail Spa, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vince Nail Spa, Inc. doing business as M. Vince Nail Spa
Defendant:
Binh T. Nguyen, M Vince Nail Spa, LLC, Raymond T. Do and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Darrin LaPine v. Jon Pavitt, et al
as 21-1332
Defendant / Appellee:
SGAMBATI, ARUS, FROST, A/Sgt., ESU, C/O and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRIN LAPINE
Kazandjian v. Uplancer, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Huy Nguyen, Abhishek Chakrabarti and Uplancer, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sarkis Kazandjian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Nguyen v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv00017
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Plaintiff:
Khe Nguyen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
