Cases 31 - 40 of 642
Montgomery v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Gary Montgomery
Defendant:
Philip E. Smith, Lesley Burnett Montgomery, Doug Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ussery v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2023cv02171
Plaintiff:
Roger Ussery
Defendant:
Shelby County and Columbia County, GA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Mays et al
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Danny E. Rogers
Defendant:
Tony Mays, Linda Stokes, Michael Jemeyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Lemaster
as 1:2023cv01026
Petitioner:
Hrondy Tarvus Rogers
Respondent:
Warden David Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edwards et al v. Fresh Foods, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Marshall Edwards and Alice Edwards
Defendant:
Fresh Foods, LLC, Johnny Harris, Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Neubert v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility
as 3:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
Brad A. Neubert
Defendant:
Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Page et al
as 3:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
David A. Avery
Defendant:
Roger A. Page, D. Michael Swiney, Arnold B. Goldin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Amen Rogers
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Neubert v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility
as 3:2022mc00048
Plaintiff:
Brad A. Neubert
Defendant:
Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice et al v. Landry's, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Rice and Roger Rice
Defendant:
Landry's, Inc. and Nashville Aquarium, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
