Cases 41 - 50 of 2,928
Payton v. Grayson County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Defendant:
Jason Woosley, Grayson County, Kentucky doing business as Grayson County Detention Center and Officer John Doe 1-5
Plaintiff:
Barry Payton
Unknown:
Warning Order Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frazer v. USA
as 5:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Musgrove v. Knox County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2024cv00093
Defendant:
Mary Hammons, Mary Hammons, Knox County, Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Musgrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Henning et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Defendant:
John T. Williams and Jordan M. Henning
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Yocum v. Truist Bank Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Truist Bank Inc., Tanya Kahn, Peoples Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Yocum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 5:2024cv00172
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 6:2024cv00092
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
