Cases 41 - 50 of 327
Coleman v. Burgh et al
as 2:2021cv03935
Plaintiff:
Roger Coleman
Defendant:
Lieutenant Burgh, Warden Emma Collins, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Burgh et al
as 2:2021oe03935
Plaintiff:
Roger Coleman
Defendant:
Lieutenant Burgh, Warden Emma Collins, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03699
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shanice Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vanhorn v. Collins, et al.
as 3:2021cv01063
Defendant:
Sargent Clarke, Nicholas D. Collins, Lieutenant Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Vanhorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03080
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vidal Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. Allegheny County, PA, PFA Unit et al
as 2:2021cv02103
Defendant:
Allegheny County, PA, PFA Unit, Franklin County Sheriff's Dept. (FCSD), Shanekqua Coates and others
Plaintiff:
Minister Norman V. Whiteside and Pastor Rosanna L. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobbeldick et al v. Cuyahoga County Corrections Center et al
as 1:2021cv01159
Plaintiff:
Frank Golphin, Lawrence Jackson, Charles Jackson and others
Defendant:
Eric Ivey, Sheriff Clifford Pinkney, Cuyahoga County Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02819
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02671
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nichelle Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Franklin County, Ohio, et al
as 2:2020cv05544
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO and Franklin County Court of Common Pleas
Plaintiff:
Marlo Coleman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
