Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 16,564
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. - Americans with Disabilities Act
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff: GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant: RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
David Ermold, et al v. Kim Davis
as 24-5524
Plaintiff: DAVID ERMOLD and DAVID MOORE
Defendant: KIM DAVIS, Individually
USA v. David Ashley
as 24-1463
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID ASHLEY
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Bradshaw et al.
as 1:2024cv00937
Plaintiff: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Defendant: Rebecca Bradshaw, omar Negron and Angel David Rosen doing business as Affordable Pallet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03037
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Thompson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03027
Plaintiff: David Thompson and Tina Thompson
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cain v. McCustion et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: Cain and Anthony Cain
Defendant: Lt Slade McCustion, Jailer Ken Claud, Major Thomas Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02956
Plaintiff: David Dukes
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Earl v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02958
Plaintiff: David Earl
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?