Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Ely v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ely
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
McGhee et al v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 2:2016cv14266
Plaintiff:
Anthony J McGhee and Kelly McGhee
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, Trustee for the Benefit of the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2004-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curto v. Ditech Financial, LLC
as 1:2016cv01373
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Curto
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greene v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01127
Plaintiff:
Bert Greene and Shirley Greene
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC and Green Tree Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greene v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01103
Plaintiff:
Bert Greene and Shirley Greene
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC and Green Tree Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. Ditech Financial, LLC
as 1:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jessie Cook and Kathy Cook
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 (b)
Hatch et al v. Ditech Financial, LLC
as 1:2016cv01252
Plaintiff:
Roger Hatch and Sandy Hatch
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cantley et al v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 2:2016cv13341
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC and Residential Credit Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robin B Cantley and Bruce A Cantley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Smith v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00625
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Smith
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC, John Doe Company, Corporation, or Other Entity and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
