Cases 41 - 50 of 215
Price Montgomery v. Maurice Ferentino, et al
as 20-3114
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF DUTTON, ROBERT MACKLIN, TIMOTHY RUSH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRICE MONTGOMERY
Maumbe v. Adducci, et al.
as 4:2019cv02973
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, Ronald Vitiello, Warden C. LaRose and others
Petitioner:
Munyaradzi Maumbe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reginald Everson v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-4154
Petitioner / Appellant:
REGINALD EVERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
Stephen Thompson v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-4142
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN THOMPSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
Lewis v. Larose, et al.
as 4:2019cv02733
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Warden Christopher Larose, CoreCivic and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Evans, Jr. v. Christopher LaRose, et al
as 19-4119
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER, CORECIVIC, R. WYMAN, Security Threat Group Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM H. EVANS, JR.
Tommy Mays, II, et al v. Frank LaRose
as 19-4112
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TOMMY RAY MAYS, II and QUINTON NELSON, SR., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANK LAROSE, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Ohio
Reginald EversonIn re: Reginald Everson
as 19-4105
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: REGINALD EVERSON
Ronald Johnson v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-4064
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD G. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
Ohioans Against Corporate Bailouts et al v. LaRose et al
as 2:2019cv04466
Defendant:
Frank LaRose and Zach Klein
Plaintiff:
John Doe # 2, Trevor J. Vessels, Brandon S. Lynaugh and others
Amicus Curiae:
Building Laborers' Union Local 310, FirstEnergy Solutions Corp., Central Ohio Green Education Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
