Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thorogood v. McHugh
as 5:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
Adam C. Thorogood
Defendant:
John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lyda Conner v. U.S. Department of the Army, et al
as 14-5355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYDA P. CONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army, THOMAS R. LAMONT, Assistant Secretary of the Army and others
Alford v. Army et al
as 2:2014cv02210
Plaintiff:
Amy Alford
Defendant:
Department of the Army, Honorable John McHugh and Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Verhovec v. City of Trotwood et al
as 3:2014cv00363
Plaintiff:
Edward Verhovec
Defendant:
City of Trotwood , Michael J Lucking , Stephen M. McHugh and others
Counter_claimant:
Stephen M. McHugh , Michael J Lucking , City of Trotwood and others
Counter_defendant:
Edward Verhovec , William E. Walker, Jr., R. Paul Cushion, II and others
Consol_defendant:
Christopher R Conard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Verhovec v. The City of Trotwood et al
as 2:2014cv00274
Plaintiff:
Edward Verhovec
Defendant:
The City of Trotwood, Michael J Lucking, Stephen M. McHugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Royal Sebring, LLC, et al v Village of Sebring, et al
as 4:2013cv02759
Plaintiff:
Royal Sebring, LLC and Jerome Edward McHugh
Defendant:
Village of Sebring, James Canell, John W. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
