Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Daniel Horacek v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 14-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HORACEK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director, MDOC, MICHAEL MARTIN, CFA Special Activities Director, MDOC and BRAD PURVIS, CFA Foodservice, MDOC
Bradford #131806 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2014cv00679
Plaintiff:
Leonard Bradford #131806
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns , Michael Martin, Unknown Wilcoxson-Bey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: David Martin
as 14-1774
Movant:
In re: DAVID MICHAEL MARTIN
Respondent:
KENNETH T. MCKEE, Warden
Spencer v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv11343
Plaintiff:
Timothy Spencer
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel Heynes, Michael Martin and others
Apollo Johnson v. Michael Martin, et al
as 14-1301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APOLLO JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTIN, Special Activities Coordinator and JAMES BOLTON
Rivera #239567 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00214
Plaintiff:
Wilson Rivera #239567
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H. Heyns, Tom Finco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Dowdy, et al v. Dave Burnett, et al
as 14-1099
Plaintiff:
ERIC DOWDY, et al
Interested Party - Appellant:
GENE T. FAVORS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE BURNETT, MICHAEL MARTIN and PATRICIA L. CARUSO
Alexander #163875 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2013cv01372
Plaintiff:
John Alexander #163875
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Rick Snyder, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Dowdy v. Dave Burnett, et al
as 13-2537
Plaintiff:
ERIC DOWDY, et al
Movant - Appellant:
DAVID LINDENSMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE BURNETT, MICHAEL MARTIN and PATRICIA L. CARUSO
Eric Dowdy, et al v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 13-2504
Plaintiff:
ERIC DOWDY, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURWOOD L. PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE BURNETT, MICHAEL MARTIN and PATRICIA L. CARUSO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
