Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00358
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Randolph v. RD Expedited, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02271
Plaintiff: Diane Randolph
Defendant: RD Expedited, Inc. and Abdulkadir Ismail Abdirahmaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. USA
as 2:2016cv00195
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Norman Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lambert et al v. CCA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00687
Plaintiff: Darroll C. Lambert
Defendant: CCA and (f/n/u) Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stangel v. Randolph et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02292
Plaintiff: John Albert Stangel
Defendant: Donna Randolph, Ronald E. Abston and Allan B. Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Lipscomb et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02023
Plaintiff: Walter McGhee, II
Defendant: Robert Lipscomb, Rickey E. Wilkins, Elma H. Mardis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bohannon v. Town of Monterey Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00093
Plaintiff: Carl Bohannon
Defendant: Town of Monterey Tennessee , Bill Randolph , Donathan Durham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Randolph v. UNUM Group Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv02395
Plaintiff: Mary E. Randolph
Defendant: UNUM Group Corporation and CCA of Tennessee, Inc. Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Randolph v. UNUM Group Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv02395
Plaintiff: Mary E. Randolph
Defendant: UNUM Group Corporation and CCA of Tennessee, Inc. Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lundmark v. AB&J Foundry et al
as 1:2014cv00106
Plaintiff: Rena Lundmark
Defendant: AB&I Foundry , Tyler Pipe Company , McWane, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?