Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Benecke-Kaliko AG v. SAI Administrative Claim & Creditor Trust
as 3:2009mc00019
Respondent:
SAI Administrative Claim & Creditor Trust, SAI Administrative Claim & Creditor Trust and SAI Administrative Claim & Creditor Trust
Movant:
Benecke-Kaliko AG and Benecke-Kaliko AG
Little Caesar Enterprises, Incorporated v. El-Bayeh et al
as 2:2009cv10140
Plaintiff:
Little Caesar Enterprises, Incorporated
Defendant:
Sayed El-Bayeh, Worcester Caesars, Incorporated and Caesar's Pizza II, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Sorpyk, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00502
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Emerald Forest Entertainment Company, Inc., Hori Productions America, Inc. doing business as Dinger and Ollie Music and others
Defendant:
Sorpyk, Inc. doing business as Club Bijou other Bootleggers and Kypros Diacou
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Islam v. Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2007cv14115
Plaintiff:
Sayed Nazrul Islam and Sayed Nazrul Islam
Defendant:
Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, Secretary of, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director of and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Johari v. Indalex Inc., et al
as 4:2007cv02755
Plaintiff:
Sai-E Johari
Defendant:
Indalex, Inc., Tim Stubbs, Jim Ambrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Say v. Adams et al
as 3:2007cv00377
Plaintiff:
Alexander M. Say
Defendant:
John Adams and John Aubrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calabrese v. Amini
as 1:2007cv01950
Plaintiff:
Dominic Calabrese
Defendant:
Saied Amini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company et al
as 1:2007cv01745
Plaintiff:
Sai Man Lee
Defendant:
Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Ohio Bell Telephone Company and City of Westlake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
